#2011 yamaha fjr1300 ecu flash plus
#2011 yamaha fjr1300 ecu flash series

#2011 yamaha fjr1300 ecu flash series

On a ride yesterday down the coast from Florence towards Reedsport Oregon there is a neat series of wide sweepers that are posted at 45 mph that I normally can zip through at 70 mph but now without the fuel cut I can take these curves anywhere from 5 to 10 mph faster and the bike just stays planted. When you're rolling through the twisties and you roll off the throttle ever so slightly while in a curve and leaned over the bike has a tendency to run wide in the curve because of the fuel cut off.

#2011 yamaha fjr1300 ecu flash plus

Here's another big plus to eliminating the fuel cut besides enabling smoother shifts which it certainly does. I would recommend Ivan's flash to any FJR Gen II owner, it will make you happy every time you ride it. No throttle snatch most importantly but all the other benefits listed are also true. All the things that are promised are delivered. Fast forward to 2020, I had my ECU flashed and it is the best money I ever spent. On every ride there would always be at least one instance of throttle jerk on roll-on. But it was like a medication, it masked the symptoms but did not cure the problem. It masked this by adding fuel to the RPM ranges where it was programmed to do that. Here is my experience with my 2006 FJR and the Power Commander III vs Ivans flash: Ivans is head and shoulders above the Power Commander.īack in 2009 when I installed the Power Commander III, that was the only option and it definitely improved the jerky throttle but it did not eliminate the fuel cut, the root cause of the driveability issue. a flash, and the add-ons just can't fix it. what you'll spend on add-ons to 'fix' vs. So far Gen2 riders seem to love the Ivan flash, haven't heard one negative, but those with it perhaps can comment more on the fuel cut, mileage, etc.Ĭost? I think you'll find it comparable. I can't say I saw much of a mileage improvement, maybe a tad that's all. I did not notice any pinging on a week-long trip with my Gen3 flash, using regular fuel in varying conditions, although I was not riding in hot summer to be fair, still don't think it would be a problem, just don't lug the engine down. IMHO you don't need to but if fuel mileage increases to offset the extra cost. Ivan recommends 89 for Gen3, not sure what he says for Gen2. too advanced and you'll get pinging under load, but a higher octane fuel can mitigate that. Another thing Ivan does is alter the timing curve a tad so it is slightly more advanced. Ivan's flash (and others) remove the fuel cut, and that is a huge improvement. there are add-ons out there to fool the ECU into thinking it's getting different air temp, but from all I've read on various bikes, these do little. There are other factors, ambient intake air temp, etc. they help if you tailor your map to add fuel in at the lowest throttle openings. It's a feature of FI, but some manage it better than others, very difficult to manage on '06-'07, and add-on modules don't fix it. On '06-'07 in particular, this was not good in combination with it's rather lean system, when you roll back on you get 'throttle snatch'. ECU basically shuts off the injectors until you roll on some throttle again. Emissions thing to stop unburned gasses in the exhaust, wasted fuel, good for the environment. One of the features of pretty much all FI systems is that when you roll off throttle to zero or near zero, a fuel cut takes place. Good article, Sparky, good explanation of the basics.